Canon EF-S Lenses: All except for the EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. This is an accessory that can be attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length by 1.4x. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. Dan is an editorial, commercial and fine art photographer based in the Canadian Yukon. So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? similar to Canon L Lenses in construction quality. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. ABOVE: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II, EF 300mm f2.8L IS lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. The following list of discontinued lenses fitting these parameters are compatible, but may require camera microfocus calibration for accurate focusing (note that not all DSLR cameras support microfocus calibration): Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM Lens --. Here's some relevant threads. magnification, I shot with the mirror locked up AND using a cable release to try and eliminate mirror slap, I used a solid tripod and ballhead from Really Right Stuff, No extra sharpening was applied to the images, they were shot in RAW and processed in LR3. Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. AF at center AF point, when any Version I, II or III Canon tele extender is used with compatible EF tele lenses AF at 27 focus points, and the central 9 points acting as cross-type points, with the following lens + extender combinations: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II lens, with Extender EF 1.4x III additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. Results will of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too. Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? Thanks. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. What can I purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus speed? But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. So there you have it a quick guide on how to use Canons 1.4x extenders! At best, using a 2.0x extender with older lens designs will result in having only one available AF point. Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. I need more reach. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. Thanks. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. The image quality differences most easily noticed between the 2x II and the 2x III are: Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. The 2X TC II never worked at all well for me so I sold it years ago. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. When Extender EF1.4X III is attached, the lens maximum aperture will be smaller (darker) by 1 stop. Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. The colors produced by Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon. I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. IMG11 = new Image(600, 404) For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The Canon EF extender has II teleconverters that are fully compatible with a number of EF lenses. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 at the best online prices at eBay! The obverse is not true. Stopping the lens down one to two stops CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. Canon 1dmk4 , iso800, f11 , 1/2000 , 600mm (300mm f2.8 L IS + 2x MKII extender). All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. JavaScript is disabled. -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. Its a better lens in every way. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. IMG1 = new Image(604, 404) Canon EF 2x II Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera l. $187.11 + $9.72 shipping. My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to my eye. So, which one should you buy? The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' I have posted a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM Lens. Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. The only difference I know of between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, no optical difference. Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. IMG4 = new Image(604, 404) Anyone whos into photography knows that Canon makes great camera equipment. Tools. I'll let you decide which ones are . Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. Extender EF 2X III meets necessary standards in terms of rugged, dustproof and water-resistant construction, and should be in every professional's camera bag. I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. . The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 50% when using the 1.4x Extender. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision . Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. I would defy any one of them to find the shots in which I have used them! However, according to the new item: 2x Extender: II vs III for my setup? The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Solution. I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. -The maximum effective aperture with the extender attached The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. 6lll&USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4 .. 5 LUSMandlll&IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 . With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. The 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) Below are the Series II and III Extenders shown for comparison. Nice to have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the bag. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? If it is, the resulting 2x focal length is very impressive. With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. Of course, to get an extender at all is the first decision to make. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. The Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use. Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. Its well-made, its easy to use, and its very affordable. You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. Always buy the best / latest you can afford . Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. The Extender EF 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF mount L-series telephoto lenses. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. Before you immediately conclude that this is a problem, understand that this reduction in drive speed now corresponds to the effective speed you would achieve with the same EF lens alone. Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. About Canon Extender See all 261 reviews Great, works great with 70-200 2.8 IS II By sb Also have 1.4X I, the 2X III is definitely worth having. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. The 2x III is similar to the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . Pretty stunning really !